Wide World of Women

you said at first that remaining silent was the easiest thing to do though lol
plus, i don't take them at their word. if Ailes told them to say something they won't say "hey, roger wanted me to defend him"
notice who didn't speak out - megyn kelly. she is the most famous of all the hosts i'm sure roger wants her to speak up but it would go against everything she has been doing the last year or so trying to be a role model for women.
http://jezebel.com/a-bunch-of-fox-news- ... 1783440545

So far 10 have spoken up for Ailes
Greta, Maria, Sandra, Ainsley, Harris, Kimberly, Martha, Mercedes, the Judge and Kiran
Other besides Megyn haven't
Right now, the others who have backed Gretchen came not from Fox and were decades ago
Not saying they're lying, but it isn't like the Cosby thing in which the accusers overwhelmingly outnumbered the defenders
I still believe the easy thing to do is stay silent
I give the ladies who spoke out plenty of credit

what did they have to lose by "speaking out"?

Some of them have been s l u t shamed by staying silent
By those wondering who got ahead by sleeping with Ailes

Imo, you're just as likely to be s lut shamed by defending him
Don't see a difference

Now Elisabeth defended Ailes and Doocy
http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/elisabe ... 201812883/

As has been pointed out, a lot of credible women are standing up for Ailes. Says a lot. IMO Kelly not saying anything is a good thing. Don't really believe she is as credible as she thinks she is. Full of herself is the reason.

Ainsley talks to People and Elisabeth releases a statement:

http://www.people.com/article/fox-news- ... oger-ailes

And Gretchen talks to The New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/13/busin ... rview.html

I couldn't agree more. I don't see any super star status with her special shows that she does they are really boring. Her own show is just her shouting over everyone else to get her point across.

If any of these Megyn Kelly comments had been said about Ainsley, they would have been deleted by now

KT McFarland, who has known Ailes since the 1970s: http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/287 ... r-ailes?dg

I think the comments about Megyn which accuse her of sleeping with Ailes SHOULD be deleted

here's all we've seen so far:
some women say he did this.
some women say he didn't.
period.
until this gets to trial, if it ever does, it really comes down to who you choose to believe.

And this isn't an election. More "votes" from one group or the other doesn't determine innocence or guilt. One more thing, not one person is calling another a liar. They're either remaining cordial or simply not talking to each other, a non-partisan lesson to be learned in our current political climate.


Exactly. My prediction is that the only way Ailes will keep his job is a settlement in which all parties have a gag order and the defendant isn't required to admit guilt, i.e., the standard terms for settlement.

Not taking sides but look at this board. With each of us members There are certain ladies that we love & some we dont.

Meaning maybe Ailes did harass some & not others.

Does anyone think he would harass van susteren ?

I just know I wouldnt want ot be on that jury. Too much he said she said. Wonder if the truth will ever come out.

not sure about that.
Guilfoyle seems to be calling Carlson a liar, IMO.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ld-matter/

tammy bruce wasn't too kind either
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/my- ... 08d3329713

A very pro Ailes article, not surprising considering the site.

Add Jedediah Bila to the list of Ailes defenders:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/jedidiah ... h-with-me/

and here's another woman who's not defending him:
http://www.chicagoreader.com/Bleader/ar ... ar-her-out