Cobra wrote:
NickAdrian wrote:
I love this so no disrespect Cobra but folks need to be able to just click and view this AKA YT.
It's higher quality on the fox news player
Youtube will re-compress a already compressed video
This has been a point of contention you've made to many on numerous occasions. While yes; all the technical media codec specs support your claim, I personally do not see any significant difference with "the naked eye" as they say.
If I make a 100MB video on my PC then upload it to YT I can then redownload it using IDM at a file size of about 30MB. I have a 23" HQ monitor and when I replay both I don't see any difference or deterioration you always refer to (at least with the naked eye).
Now maybe if you're talking about using the original video for some fancy extended reprocessing purpose then I don't know. But for my purposes and I will be bold enough to say for those of the majority I don't see what the fuss is. I've often embedded a youtube video here with an accompanying mediafire download link. I often use youtube to compress videos because it reduces file size so folks can download a smaller size vid file making it quicker. And does that mean your logic also applies to screencaptures? I mean people don't post huge 2.5 MB bmp images when they can post the same image in 50KB jpeg format.
If my a$$ is twisted about this tell me what I'm missing because I'm always a willing learner.
(ps: mods, feel free to move this to the tech support thread if you think it has merit)
FAQ
Search
Members
Login
