Erin Andrews (C)

aztec · **Posted:** Wed Mar 23, 2016 1:41 pm

Homeskillet · **Joined:** Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:11 am **Posts:** 892

Awesome! Thanks AZ!

HarvBaby · **Joined:** Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:34 pm **Posts:** 1537

Oh this is nice, and maybe one of the shortest numbers I've seen Erin in. Thanks Aztec!!

hanley · **Joined:** Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:51 pm **Posts:** 846

funny, don't remember her looking like this during the trial.

HarvBaby · **Joined:** Sat Nov 18, 2006 3:34 pm **Posts:** 1537

hanley wrote:

funny, don't remember her looking like this during the trial.

She certainly didn't lol.

fordloco · **Posted:** Wed Mar 23, 2016 5:21 pm

just

I would settle with her anytime.

notter59 · **Joined:** Tue Aug 10, 2004 7:43 pm **Posts:** 817

$75M for a video so blurry I wouldn't have known it was her if not told.

LEGSunX · **Joined:** Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:55 am **Posts:** 219

Oh and Now she wants to show the world!!
Next she'll be suing the cameraman for showing her legs!!
And the oscars goes for best tears in a trial....

johnkay · **Joined:** Sun Nov 25, 2012 12:23 am **Posts:** 6403

sgturner · **Joined:** Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:48 am **Posts:** 7693

thanks

braniac · **Posted:** Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:52 pm

notter59 wrote:

$75M for a video so blurry I wouldn't have known it was her if not told.

But you do know and so do millions of other people. Look, she was violated. It's wasn't just that she was filmed naked but that the video was put out there for everyone to see and there is no way to cancel that.

LEGSunX wrote:

Oh and Now she wants to show the world!!
Next she'll be suing the cameraman for showing her legs!!
And the oscars goes for best tears in a trial....

Unless you're making a joke, and if so it's really poor one, this has gotta be one of the most stupid comments I've read on this board. Making the choice to show your legs on TV is absolutely nothing like have someone film you naked without your knowledge. You think the tears were a joke? Think about this happening to your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your mother. How would they feel?

What happened to her will haunt her for the rest of her life. She'll never forget it and it will be brought up over and over and over again until the day she dies. She deserved every penny she got.

rangerman04 · **Joined:** Sun Aug 08, 2004 5:36 pm **Posts:** 2880

braniac wrote:

notter59 wrote:

$75M for a video so blurry I wouldn't have known it was her if not told.

But you do know and so do millions of other people. Look, she was violated. It's wasn't just that she was filmed naked but that the video was put out there for everyone to see and there is no way to cancel that.

LEGSunX wrote:

Oh and Now she wants to show the world!!
Next she'll be suing the cameraman for showing her legs!!
And the oscars goes for best tears in a trial....

Unless you're making a joke, and if so it's really poor one, this has gotta be one of the most stupid comments I've read on this board. Making the choice to show your legs on TV is absolutely nothing like have someone film you naked without your knowledge. You think the tears were a joke? Think about this happening to your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your mother. How would they feel?

What happened to her will haunt her for the rest of her life. She'll never forget it and it will be brought up over and over and over again until the day she dies. She deserved every penny she got.

Absolutely correct Brain. Let me also say that she was watching the camera or monitor very closely in the caps. Take a gander. In a way she is walking a tightrope. She is being more cautious now. And that she will do for a long time to come.

markzomos · **Joined:** Sat May 26, 2012 9:30 am **Posts:** 7539

denden · **Posted:** Fri Mar 25, 2016 1:21 pm

braniac wrote:

notter59 wrote:

$75M for a video so blurry I wouldn't have known it was her if not told.

But you do know and so do millions of other people. Look, she was violated. It's wasn't just that she was filmed naked but that the video was put out there for everyone to see and there is no way to cancel that.

LEGSunX wrote:

Oh and Now she wants to show the world!!
Next she'll be suing the cameraman for showing her legs!!
And the oscars goes for best tears in a trial....

Unless you're making a joke, and if so it's really poor one, this has gotta be one of the most stupid comments I've read on this board. Making the choice to show your legs on TV is absolutely nothing like have someone film you naked without your knowledge. You think the tears were a joke? Think about this happening to your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your mother. How would they feel?
:Thumb

What happened to her will haunt her for the rest of her life. She'll never forget it and it will be brought up over and over and over again until the day she dies. She deserved every penny she got.

hanley · **Joined:** Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:51 pm **Posts:** 846

rangerman04 wrote:

She is being more cautious now. And that she will do for a long time to come.

and you know that how, exactly?

LEGSunX · **Joined:** Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:55 am **Posts:** 219

braniac wrote:

notter59 wrote:

$75M for a video so blurry I wouldn't have known it was her if not told.

But you do know and so do millions of other people. Look, she was violated. It's wasn't just that she was filmed naked but that the video was put out there for everyone to see and there is no way to cancel that.

LEGSunX wrote:

Oh and Now she wants to show the world!!
Next she'll be suing the cameraman for showing her legs!!
And the oscars goes for best tears in a trial....

Unless you're making a joke, and if so it's really poor one, this has gotta be one of the most stupid comments I've read on this board. Making the choice to show your legs on TV is absolutely nothing like have someone film you naked without your knowledge. You think the tears were a joke? Think about this happening to your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your mother. How would they feel?

What happened to her will haunt her for the rest of her life. She'll never forget it and it will be brought up over and over and over again until the day she dies. She deserved every penny she got.

Oh and suing for millions will make it seem all alright. So sending that guy to prison not justice enough?
And you should change your username to "hypocrite", How would you like to see your mother, sister, etc... On this site? Why did you become a member And now all of a sudden your a women's activist...gimme a break!!

braniac · **Posted:** Sat Mar 26, 2016 11:00 am

LEGSunX wrote:

braniac wrote:

notter59 wrote:

$75M for a video so blurry I wouldn't have known it was her if not told.

But you do know and so do millions of other people. Look, she was violated. It's wasn't just that she was filmed naked but that the video was put out there for everyone to see and there is no way to cancel that.

LEGSunX wrote:

Oh and Now she wants to show the world!!
Next she'll be suing the cameraman for showing her legs!!
And the oscars goes for best tears in a trial....

Unless you're making a joke, and if so it's really poor one, this has gotta be one of the most stupid comments I've read on this board. Making the choice to show your legs on TV is absolutely nothing like have someone film you naked without your knowledge. You think the tears were a joke? Think about this happening to your wife, your girlfriend, your sister, your mother. How would they feel?

What happened to her will haunt her for the rest of her life. She'll never forget it and it will be brought up over and over and over again until the day she dies. She deserved every penny she got.

Oh and suing for millions will make it seem all alright. So sending that guy to prison not justice enough?
And you should change your username to "hypocrite", How would you like to see your mother, sister, etc... On this site? Why did you become a member And now all of a sudden your a women's activist...gimme a break!!

1. No, sending the guy to prison wasn't enough. He wasn't the only guilty party in this. Large monetary awards hurt the guilty party and are likely to change their behavior to prevent things like this from happening in the future.
2. We don't post private, secret pictures of *anyone* here. In fact it's against the rules to even post public candid shots in which the person obviously didn't give permission.
3. I've been in favor of women's rights all my life.
4. Perhaps you should change your username to "cretin". :jetserl

rangerman04 · **Joined:** Sun Aug 08, 2004 5:36 pm **Posts:** 2880

hanley wrote:

rangerman04 wrote:

She is being more cautious now. And that she will do for a long time to come.

and you know that how, exactly?

Well hanley put the shoe on another foot. What if this happened to your girlfriend or wife or significant other. How do you think they would do!

hanley · **Joined:** Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:51 pm **Posts:** 846

rangerman04 wrote:

hanley wrote:

rangerman04 wrote:

She is being more cautious now. And that she will do for a long time to come.

and you know that how, exactly?

Well hanley put the shoe on another foot. What if this happened to your girlfriend or wife or significant other. How do you think they would do!

I have no idea.
and obviously neither do you, you're just speculating.

braniac · **Posted:** Sat Mar 26, 2016 5:14 pm

With the back and forth between hanley and rangerman04, and LEGSunX and me, I have a feeling this thread is going to be locked down quite soon. :jetserl

Wide World of Women

Erin Andrews (C)

Who is online